maxvag
I see in your example what others (and myself) are complaining about
these issues have already been discussed:
lens barrel distortion (I'm not sure if that encompasses blurry corners, but blur in the corners is arguably a by product of the iPhone 16 pro optical lens design)
fixed f/stop - wide open - shallow depth of field: these iPhone lenses only shoot wide open at f/1.78, f/2.2 (so we can't stop down to extend their extreme shallow depth of field) -- we have to actually tap focus if we want any selective focus control
the correct point to tap focus lock is on a person's eyes -- and if one gets the eyes in focus the rest doesn't matter so much -- my instinct is the Apple software is excellent at focusing on eyes (human or animal) with little user effort as long as they are in a realistic space that depth of field can cover
focus plane, film plane, sensor plane (what ever people call it these days) must be parallel with the plane of focus (your FLAT surface) for optimal test results shooting FLAT documents, but only lenses designed for copy work prioritize this match up in a 'perfect' scenario
THAT MEANS if we have 2-3 or more faces in a frame of half bodies, for example -- we have to get everyone's eyes lining up in parallel with the sensor plane if we want everyone's eyes sharp -- this has never changed
these iPhone lens don't seem to optically BROKEH well -- but amazing in Apple's software processing
software (over processing): shoot RAW (stills) or LOG (video) to observe the processing...