YondoValano wrote:
I understand that for normal operation, installation, programming... and in general, comfortable use of the MacBook - it would be nice to have a version with +500GB. then I wouldn't care about a hidden directory weighing 50GB.
But that 50 GB is the operating system. You can't delete it or prune it down in any way. It is what it is.
I used the DaisyDisk program to find the files. Then I rechecked the data through the Finder, and it showed that the /Cryptexes folder was taking up much more space!
I don't know how DaisyDisk calculates those things and I know the Finder can't be trusted.
I'm currently developing my own storage management tool, so I deal with these issues quite a bit. (I already have a crude version in EtreCheckPro, but apparently no one has ever found it in the menu bar.)
I'm assuming your auto-generated tag "MacBook Air 13″, macOS 26.1" is correct. Here is what my similar computer says:
/tmp $ diskutil list
/dev/disk0 (internal, physical):
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: GUID_partition_scheme *1.0 TB disk0
1: Apple_APFS_ISC Container disk1 524.3 MB disk0s1
2: Apple_APFS Container disk3 994.7 GB disk0s2
3: Apple_APFS_Recovery Container disk2 5.4 GB disk0s3
/dev/disk3 (synthesized):
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: APFS Container Scheme - +994.7 GB disk3
Physical Store disk0s2
1: APFS Volume Macintosh HD - Data 758.7 GB disk3s1
2: APFS Volume Macintosh HD 12.2 GB disk3s3
3: APFS Snapshot com.apple.os.update-... 12.2 GB disk3s3s1
4: APFS Volume Preboot 8.1 GB disk3s4
5: APFS Volume Recovery 1.2 GB disk3s5
6: APFS Volume VM 16.1 GB disk3s6
7: APFS Volume shared 13.0 GB disk3s7
But that's low-level APFS disk partitions. We have to check how this relates to volumes:
/tmp $ mount
/dev/disk3s3s1 on / (apfs, sealed, local, read-only, journaled)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse)
/dev/disk3s6 on /System/Volumes/VM (apfs, local, noexec, journaled, noatime, nobrowse)
/dev/disk3s4 on /System/Volumes/Preboot (apfs, local, journaled, nobrowse)
/dev/disk3s2 on /System/Volumes/Update (apfs, local, journaled, nobrowse)
/dev/disk1s2 on /System/Volumes/xarts (apfs, local, noexec, journaled, noatime, nobrowse)
/dev/disk1s1 on /System/Volumes/iSCPreboot (apfs, local, journaled, nobrowse)
/dev/disk1s3 on /System/Volumes/Hardware (apfs, local, journaled, nobrowse)
/dev/disk3s1 on /System/Volumes/Data (apfs, local, journaled, nobrowse, protect, root data)
/dev/disk3s7 on /Volumes/shared (apfs, local, journaled, noowners, protect)
map auto_home on /System/Volumes/Data/home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse)
OK. This establishes that /System/Volumes/Preboot is verily device /dev/disk3s4. From the first list, we can see that this consumes 8.1 GB of storage.
Let's check and see what the Finder says:

OK. Finder's wrong. Most likely explanation is system file compression.
I have a different UUID folder than you do. That should be fine, it's a UUID after all. (Pro tip: they're not really universally unique. They are only unique to the device that generates them. If multiple devices are generating UUIDs, you can get duplicates.)

Again, not true. We know that this partition is only 8.1 GB in size. Yet Finder has just told us that it's 27.36 GB. It's not. There is a sibling folder for "Diagnostic Reports". Mine has 1107 bytes. I'm guessing that your folder has 18 GB.
You might be able to investigate that and figure out where your extra 18 GB is coming from. That's possibly fixable. But you're far more likely to be able to find and delete 18 GB from somewhere else on the drive.
My tool won't even let people examine these system folders. That's because it's always going to be some complicated rabbit hole like this. I don't want to deal with that. It's much easier to direct people towards their own data where they have a much greater chance of a successful outcome. It's way easier and less confusing.
I fundamentally agree that Apple shouldn't be consuming this much storage, shouldn't make things so complicated, and shouldn't be releasing software that's this buggy and confusing. But I can't fix that. And I sure can't stop people from applying each and every Apple update within seconds of it being released. Can't figure that out. The worse Apple's quality becomes, the more obsessively people have to have it NOW!!!!