I understand what you are saying and I agree to a certain point but let's get back to the basics.
What are films all about?
They are simply devices to tell a story just like books and plays and songs etc.
So how you achieve that story should be immaterial . . . after all we don't stop an author writing because of their dyslexia . . . we just want their imagination transferred into our brains and it is the same with films.
We want the film to tell a story and it should not matter what technical means are used to achieve that end.
My video clip was extremely crude as it was simply a proof of concept test but really complex films are possible and it does not mean they can be created by talentless people as there has to be the "script" followed by the knowledge of how to control the AI. As you saw in my example, the participants almost doubled in numbers, so a technique is required to prevent that.
Furthermore, short as it was, my effort required a number of steps such as creating new photos from the last frame of each clip in order to get Grok to progress the action and location . . . it wasn't simply a matter of writing, "Make the boys run from the bridge, go through a forrest and meet a triceratops."
So making an AI movie would not be talentless, it would simply be using a different set of skills.
You could just as easily say that photography and film making is devoid of talent and is done by people who can't paint or perform plays in a theatre.
