Joseph Corl wrote:
I see your point, but my concern isn’t about whether Apple explicitly says a screen protector is needed—it’s that users who never needed one before are now noticing scratches from normal use. That’s a change in real-world durability.
If someone hasn't used a screen protector on a previous model phone, and their phone got zero scratches, they were simply unbelievably lucky. The data here on this forum from users who complained just as vocally for just about every model sold over the last several generations suggests otherwise. And they suggested they scratched easily. I'm sure they weren't lying. I'm not suggesting anyone in this thread is lying. I AM suggesting it's not new or any more unusual than it has been with the previous generations of iPhone. And that's the real point. iPhone 16 models don't scratch any easier than other model iPhones.
The ONLY iPhone I never put a screen protector was my iPhone 6. It scratched like crazy and I vowed then and there that ANY iPhone I buy in the future will get a screen protector installed before it is even powered on. That is the ONLY way to make sure your screen can avoid getting scratched. On my iPhone 16 Pro Max, I've already changed the protector as my first protector got some scratches. When I took the protector off to prepare the phone for a new one, the screen underneath was pristine. My new screen protector claims 10H hardness whereas most claim 9H. The new protector has not developed a single scratch. But the good news is if it does and if the scratch bothers me, I can simply, easily and affordably replace it.