You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

advantages of APFS library with FCP

hi there,


i have just bought a 16tb self powered external seagate hard disk.


i want to use it for creating, adding and expanding fcp libraries. i would also like to save raw and rendered outputs on the same disk.


i wanted to know if there are distinct advantages of having an APFS file system on this disk as compared to ex-fat or ntfs.


will the entire fcp environment function better on APFS file system!?


thanks in advance.

with HIS blessings,

iMac 24″

Posted on Jan 22, 2025 1:36 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Jan 22, 2025 1:55 AM

You must never use NTFS or ExFAT drives for your libraries. They lack the appropriate metadata capabilities that FCP relies on, and sooner or later you will end up with costly problems.


It is widely recommended to use APFS for SSD, and Mac OS Extended (*) for rotating hard drives when used with FCP.


Here is an Apple support document:


Format storage devices for Final Cut Pro, Motion, and Compressor - Apple Support


(*) The linked support document mentions only APFS

3 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Jan 22, 2025 1:55 AM in response to oshomysteryschool

You must never use NTFS or ExFAT drives for your libraries. They lack the appropriate metadata capabilities that FCP relies on, and sooner or later you will end up with costly problems.


It is widely recommended to use APFS for SSD, and Mac OS Extended (*) for rotating hard drives when used with FCP.


Here is an Apple support document:


Format storage devices for Final Cut Pro, Motion, and Compressor - Apple Support


(*) The linked support document mentions only APFS

Jan 22, 2025 7:57 AM in response to oshomysteryschool

What Luis said is absolutely right. Another advantage of APFS is file cloning, which happens at a block level.


E.g, in Finder if you right-click and duplicate a library or media file, with APFS it doesn't take any additional space, regardless of what Get Info shows on the new file or library. The filesystem presents the illusion of two separate files/libraries, but they are "backed" by a single physical copy. If one file is edited, only the changed data blocks are duplicated. This improves performance and reduces the number of erase-write cycles on SSDs. The cloning feature only exists within a single APFS volume. If you copy a file or directory between volumes, that requires a full data copy. For more info Google "APFS: Files and clones".


When an application hang/crash, sudden OS shutdown or power failure happens, ExFAT has no protection from that, HFS+ is better and APFS is the best. However, I would not use APFS on a mechanical drive due to various technical factors.


Ideally, you'd like all media, library, and cache on an APFS-formatted SSD, but for large amounts of data, that could be expensive. Lacking that, I'd suggest an AFPS-formatted SSD for a "lean" library (ie, using "leave files in place" and render cache outside the library), then the media files on a 7200 rpm mechanical RAID. If space permits put the render cache on SSD also.


It's also possible to leave the render cache inside the library (on SSD) and if you need to copy or move that, delete the render cache first. However, optical flow analysis files are not deleted using FCP menu commands. To avoid opening the library in Finder and deleting those, if cache files are placed external to the library via the Library Inspector>Modify Settings>Cache, this puts both analysis files and render files in a single location which can be safely deleted.


Most of our cameras record in ExFAT but that is write-once, not doing transactions. It's also best to not delete files in-camera, rather offload everything to an SSD hard drive (ideally APFS), delete what you don't need then reformat the data card in the camera. ExFAT has no capability to handle fragmentation, so if in-camera file deletes are done, it can sometimes hit a performance limit when recording subsequent clips and drop frames (or worse). For the same reason, don't fill the camera card to 100%.


advantages of APFS library with FCP

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.